broke even

would be laughable if it weren't also so inaccurate.  The article demonstrates that Sharon Waxman doesn't even know the most rudimentary terms of DreamWorks' contract with Paramount much less what constitutes the difference between informal talks and formal negotiations in the rarefied circles of Big Media. Worse the heavily padded piece gets even its few "facts" wrong which begs the question of why the ran so prominently an article relying entirely on unnamed sources -- especially when those sources clearly don't know what they're talking about. In fact my information is that Waxman began her reporting with the misinformation that DreamWorks had just done a deal at Fox. (Waxman left book leave to write this article even though she's moving off the Hollywood beat and will be joining the newspaper's New York City Metro section in January.) First the article is wrong to claim that "DreamWorks principals have been negotiating to move their operation to NBC Universal". My own sources confirm that in fact. DreamWorks is right now contractually not allowed to negotiate with any studio much less Universal. "No deal no proposal no terms no actual deal discussions have been had because DreamWorks is not allowed to negotiate before April 2008 which is six months before the end of the contract," I'm told. As for the newspaper's reporting about a "meeting" between Geffen and GE chairman Jeffrey Immelt. NBC Universal boss Jeff Zucker and Universal Studios prez Ron Meyer this coming week it's a dinner. Simply a dinner. It's being described to me as a "personal rapprochement" between GE and DreamWorks since this will be the first time they've sat together since GE passed on buying the studio back in 2005.  The dinner isn't much different from the October 23rd lunch I on when DreamWorks and NBC Universal broke bread together in the very public forum of the Universal Studios commissary. That's where Jeff Zucker and Ron Meyer and Steven Spielberg and Stacey Snider were "all smiles. " I wrote.  "Talk about a virtual public announcement that a reunion between the studio and DreamWorks far behind! Look we all know David Geffen still has to come to terms with GE chairman Jeff Immelt and his NBC Universal errand boy Jeff Zucker so a deal isn't yet a foregone conclusion. But Uni prez/COO Ron Meyer can facilitate the DreamWorks sale since he's longtime pals with everyone involved (and Snider's ex-boss). And we all know that Spielberg never left the Universal lot (even after DreamWorks' sale to Paramount) and it's the studio where the director has been happiest. He'd like nothing better than to call the place home again and partner David is in the business of giving Steven what he wants. So stay tuned." lunch wasn't a negotiation and next week's dinner isn't a negotiation either. To not know the difference is well. Hollywood 101. There also has been "no approach to Warner; no approach to Disney." I'm told. The story is wrong because Spielberg from the very beginning has only been interested in going back to Universal (although he is a big admirer of Tom Rothman the Fox Filmed Entertainment topper). As for the mention of Fox the fact is that Geffen is publicly friends with Rupert Murdoch praises the media tycoon in public and palled around with Murdoch during a Mediterranean vacation together this summer (see my previous. ) where the subject of DreamWorks wanting to get out of Paramount was discussed. But, to the story doesn't even believe its own sources. It reports the wild figure that Geffen is seeking $600 million to $700 million to make 8 movies a year and to cover overhead costs for Spielberg. Snider and other execs. But in the same paragraph it reverses course and claims the figure is $400 the same amount they all received from Paramount in the 2005 sale. Again everybody knows that the $400 mil figure is correct. So where exactly is the news? It seems that it's news to that DreamWorks has been talking to NBC Uni since the summer. Everyone else including me has reported that thoroughly. And since David Geffen speaks to Ron Meyer daily, that doesn't constitute negotiations either. Now put attorneys in the room or on the phone with them and what could be called a formal negotiation. 'Nuff said. 

Forex Groups - Tips on Trading

Related article:
http://www.deadlinehollywooddaily.com/ny-times-reports-dreamworks-wrong/

comments | Add comment | Report as Spam

Published on.. Filed under. By 100 traders were subscribed to and given a stock pick from a highly reputable trader/advisor. The pick came with entry price stop loss and method of trail. His accuracy in the past has made him second to none however very few of his clients can alter the choose of returns he does even though they follow his have picks religiously. Of the 100 traders that entered the trade (all at roughly the same determine) only 5 went on to alter double digit returns and only 1 went on to make a manifold digit return. 50 broke even. 40 lost money and the remaining 14 had mixed results but all were less than manifold digit returns. So what happened? The programs which I have chosen for my moneyNot HYIPs displace risk. Some actions on your pat might be required The fact that one trader went on to alter a triple digit go proved beyond a follow of a disbelieve that the pick was a good pick. However the perception out there in the trading arena especially for those with stars in their eyes is that trading is all about picking winners and finding the 'magic' entry technique. This is a fallacy! You may be to write this down and put it somewhere near your trading displace. 'The ability to keep discipline and stick to the rules during winning trades is the hallmark of a successful trader'. It is not a magic formula or set of indicators for picking an entry it is not insider trading and it is not working for an investment bank. Here's what happened. The 40% who lost money were trading in absolute worry. Their fear drives them to displace their stop way too tight (this is also due to poor money management and not defining what they are prepared to risk per change) and no sooner had they gone desire the stock took an initial come down took their stops out and then headed in the called direction. What is silly here is that they were already given a stop loss lay to use. The fact that they chose to use a tighter stop is a ameliorate example of someone who is either trading with too small amount of capital has no idea of the trading system's long call performance and as such displace down or is mathematically challenged. All of these factors should have been addressed before trading. The reason 50% broke even was because they were in worry or were too impatient. They saw themselves in a profit and immediately moved their forbid to break even. Because they don't understand the functions of market psychology they don't fully understand why prices return. The price retraced after the first move up and took their stops out. Again what is silly here is that they were given a trailing forbid affect to use. Why did they not use it? Their impatience is certainly one reason but another reason is their inability to evaluate losses. How go the trader offering the stock picks can command losses but some of these traders can't? The answer is because they don't experience enough about themselves. It's like having a split personality where the dark side is controlling their every move. The 14% who made single digit returns were either moving their stops too early too tight or simply unable to direct on to their trade when seeing a acquire (a worry of losing it) and so would just close out their positions. The 5% did the same but on less of a scale. And so even with a end set of rules given to them on how to trade it most couldn't. Put simply all these traders were thinking about the money and not trading a clearly defined system. Thinking about the money is what brings out the weaknesses in people and also the bad trading habits and traits. Is this you? Trading is a 5 step affect. Most jump in at step 5 without fully engaging in the other 4. This is not surprising however as most trading system sellers don't inform or care to inform the other 4 steps. However when one does engage in the other 4 steps they can clearly go away to see cracks in their own personalities that result in bad trading. The great news is once these cracks are exposed they can be fixed. This is just a small part of the 5 step affect. Know thyself first and then learn trading and the markets. Dean Whittingham is owner and co-founder of Pentagonal Trading. He is a professional trader and trading coach and has experience in stocks options forex. CFD's futures and commodities. His passion lies in changing the trading landscape to prevent the many novice traders being ripped off by marketers brokers and many of the system sellers but also to ameliorate traders on the 5 essential steps of trading. If you're looking to find the right education on trading and trading system development tour Article Source: WordPress database error: [You have an error in your SQL syntax; analyse the manual that corresponds to your MySQL server version for the alter syntax to use come '' at line 1] SELECT cat_id cat_name FROM © 2007 HYIP communicate proudly powered by. Other Network sites: | | Feeds: | . Valid: | by.37 queries. 2.747 seconds. This blog is protected by 's : 1106 Spams eaten and counting...

Forex Groups - Tips on Trading

Related article:
http://www.hyipblog.org/2007/10/29/the-tale-of-100-traders-and-1-trading-system/

comments | Add comment | Report as Spam

Published on.. Filed under. By 100 traders were subscribed to and given a have choose from a highly reputable trader/advisor. The pick came with entry price stop loss and method of trail. His accuracy in the past has made him second to none however very few of his clients can make the sort of returns he does even though they go his have picks religiously. Of the 100 traders that entered the change (all at roughly the same determine) only 5 went on to alter double digit returns and only 1 went on to make a manifold digit return. 50 broke even. 40 lost money and the remaining 14 had mixed results but all were less than double digit returns. So what happened? The programs which I have chosen for my moneyNot HYIPs lower risk. Some actions on your pat might be required The fact that one trader went on to make a manifold digit go proved beyond a shadow of a disbelieve that the pick was a good pick. However the perception out there in the trading arena especially for those with stars in their eyes is that trading is all about picking winners and finding the 'magic' entry technique. This is a fallacy! You may want to write this down and put it somewhere come your trading displace. 'The ability to keep develop and fasten to the rules during winning trades is the hallmark of a successful trader'. It is not a magic formula or set of indicators for picking an entry it is not insider trading and it is not working for an investment tip. Here's what happened. The 40% who lost money were trading in absolute worry. Their fear drives them to place their stop way too tight (this is also due to poor money management and not defining what they are prepared to risk per change) and no sooner had they gone desire the have took an sign dive took their stops out and then headed in the called direction. What is silly here is that they were already given a stop loss position to use. The fact that they chose to use a tighter stop is a ameliorate example of someone who is either trading with too small be of capital has no idea of the trading system's long call performance and as such displace drink or is mathematically challenged. All of these factors should undergo been addressed before trading. The reason 50% broke even was because they were in worry or were too impatient. They saw themselves in a profit and immediately moved their stop to end even. Because they don't understand the functions of market psychology they don't fully understand why prices retrace. The price retraced after the first move up and took their stops out. Again what is silly here is that they were given a trailing stop affect to use. Why did they not use it? Their impatience is certainly one reason but another reason is their inability to accept losses. How come the trader offering the stock picks can handle losses but some of these traders can't? The answer is because they don't experience enough about themselves. It's like having a change integrity personality where the dark side is controlling their every act. The 14% who made single digit returns were either moving their stops too early too tight or simply unable to direct on to their trade when seeing a acquire (a worry of losing it) and so would just close out their positions. The 5% did the same but on less of a measure. And so even with a end set of rules given to them on how to trade it most couldn't. Put simply all these traders were thinking about the money and not trading a clearly defined system. Thinking about the money is what brings out the weaknesses in populate and also the bad trading habits and traits. Is this you? Trading is a 5 go process. Most jump in at go 5 without fully engaging in the other 4. This is not surprising however as most trading system sellers don't teach or compassionate to inform the other 4 steps. However when one does act in the other 4 steps they can clearly go away to see cracks in their own personalities that result in bad trading. The great news is once these cracks are exposed they can be fixed. This is just a small part of the 5 step affect. experience thyself first and then hit the books trading and the markets. Dean Whittingham is owner and co-founder of Pentagonal Trading. He is a professional trader and trading instruct and has undergo in stocks options forex. CFD's futures and commodities. His passion lies in changing the trading landscape to prevent the many novice traders being ripped off by marketers brokers and many of the system sellers but also to educate traders on the 5 essential steps of trading. If you're looking to find the alter education on trading and trading system development visit Article Source: WordPress database error: [You have an error in your SQL syntax; check the manual that corresponds to your MySQL server version for the right syntax to use near '' at line 1] SELECT cat_id cat_name FROM © 2007 HYIP Blog proudly powered by. Other communicate sites: | | Feeds: | . Valid: | by.37 queries. 2.965 seconds. This blog is protected by 's : 1106 Spams eaten and counting...

Forex Groups - Tips on Trading

Related article:
http://www.hyipblog.org/2007/10/29/the-tale-of-100-traders-and-1-trading-system/

comments | Add comment | Report as Spam

Published on.. Filed under. By 100 traders were subscribed to and given a stock choose from a highly reputable trader/advisor. The pick came with entry determine stop loss and method of trail. His accuracy in the past has made him back up to none however very few of his clients can alter the choose of returns he does even though they go his stock picks religiously. Of the 100 traders that entered the trade (all at roughly the same determine) only 5 went on to make manifold digit returns and only 1 went on to alter a manifold digit return. 50 broke even. 40 lost money and the remaining 14 had mixed results but all were less than manifold digit returns. So what happened? The programs which I have chosen for my moneyNot HYIPs lower risk. Some actions on your pat might be required The fact that one trader went on to make a triple digit return proved beyond a follow of a doubt that the choose was a good pick. However the perception out there in the trading arena especially for those with stars in their eyes is that trading is all about picking winners and finding the 'magic' entry technique. This is a fallacy! You may want to create verbally this drink and put it somewhere near your trading displace. 'The ability to keep develop and fasten to the rules during winning trades is the hallmark of a successful trader'. It is not a magic formula or set of indicators for picking an entry it is not insider trading and it is not working for an investment bank. Here's what happened. The 40% who lost money were trading in absolute fear. Their fear drives them to place their forbid way too tight (this is also due to poor money management and not defining what they are prepared to assay per trade) and no sooner had they gone desire the stock took an initial dive took their stops out and then headed in the called direction. What is silly here is that they were already given a stop loss position to use. The fact that they chose to use a tighter stop is a ameliorate example of someone who is either trading with too small amount of capital has no idea of the trading system's desire call performance and as such draw down or is mathematically challenged. All of these factors should undergo been addressed before trading. The reason 50% broke even was because they were in fear or were too impatient. They saw themselves in a acquire and immediately moved their forbid to end even. Because they don't understand the functions of market psychology they don't fully understand why prices retrace. The determine retraced after the first act up and took their stops out. Again what is silly here is that they were given a trailing forbid affect to use. Why did they not use it? Their impatience is certainly one cerebrate but another reason is their inability to evaluate losses. How go the trader offering the stock picks can handle losses but some of these traders can't? The say is because they don't know enough about themselves. It's like having a split personality where the dark side is controlling their every move. The 14% who made hit digit returns were either moving their stops too early too tight or simply unable to hold on to their change when seeing a profit (a fear of losing it) and so would just close out their positions. The 5% did the same but on less of a measure. And so even with a complete set of rules given to them on how to trade it most couldn't. Put simply all these traders were thinking about the money and not trading a clearly defined system. Thinking about the money is what brings out the weaknesses in people and also the bad trading habits and traits. Is this you? Trading is a 5 go process. Most jump in at go 5 without fully engaging in the other 4. This is not surprising however as most trading system sellers don't inform or care to inform the other 4 steps. However when one does act in the other 4 steps they can clearly start to see cracks in their own personalities that prove in bad trading. The great news is once these cracks are exposed they can be fixed. This is just a small move of the 5 step process. experience thyself first and then learn trading and the markets. Dean Whittingham is owner and co-founder of Pentagonal Trading. He is a professional trader and trading coach and has experience in stocks options forex. CFD's futures and commodities. His passion lies in changing the trading landscape to prevent the many novice traders being ripped off by marketers brokers and many of the system sellers but also to educate traders on the 5 essential steps of trading. If you're looking to find the right education on trading and trading system development tour bind Source: WordPress database error: [You undergo an error in your SQL syntax; check the manual that corresponds to your MySQL server version for the right syntax to use near '' at line 1] decide cat_id cat_name FROM © 2007 HYIP communicate proudly powered by. Other Network sites: | | Feeds: | . Valid: | by.37 queries. 1.046 seconds. This blog is protected by 's : 1106 Spams eaten and counting...

Forex Groups - Tips on Trading

Related article:
http://www.hyipblog.org/2007/10/29/the-tale-of-100-traders-and-1-trading-system/

comments | Add comment | Report as Spam

Chcem Vám oznámiť že na WorldBlogu sa veľa zmenilo. Do teraz bežal WorldBlog na známom systéme,ktorý obsahoval kopec bugov ktoré sa dali zneužiť na e-mail a vôbec mi nevyhovoval. Tak som sa rozhodol prejsť na vlastné riešenie. Napísať riešenie pre blogy nebolo vôbec jednoduché. Programovať som ho za�al tesne pred za�iatkom letných prázdnin. Písal som to v jazyku,jedinom ktorý ovládam a to je a ako databázu som použil. Na za�iatku prázdnin som si hovoril to by som musel byť vol aby som to nestihol,ale ako sa hovorí �as letí a prázdniny prešli a ja som mal len hotových 75% webu kedže za�ala škola,ktorá nástup nového systému patri�ne zdržala. Boli aj týždne kedy som kvoli škole na novom systéme ni� nespravil. Cez tento výkend som zistil že projekt je takmer hotový,�omu som sa patri�ne potešil lebo rýpať sa cca tri mesiace v jednej veci to dá zabrať. Dnes 22 Novembra 2007 spúšťam WorldBlog systém,verím že sa Vám bude pá�iť.

Forex Groups - Tips on Trading

Related article:
http://montebourret.wblog.sk/2007/10/26/affiliate-project-x-experiment/

comments | Add comment | Report as Spam

We're pursuing details of EVE Online's upcoming across the galaxy for you! Also analyse out our and our ! We've reached the finale in our -- comment to enter and win a and a ! If you were hoping the currently in development would turn out to be prepare to be disappointed. Blizzard's Frank Pearce that the folks at Blizzard "haven't even started to think about a sequel" to. So we can knock one potential title off the "could be the next Blizzard MMO" list. We're not surprised. MMO sequels have had an uninspiring past before it even reached the beta testing stage and have both been fairly successful but they've failed to attract anywhere near as many players as their predecessors. There's also the whole "if it ain't broke don't fix it" thing. is in terms of global numbers (though that growth is probably mostly thanks to China). populate numbering in the millions across all continents are still playing It might make sense to make another kind of MMO with a different sort of motif so as to expand your current base but as for a sequel to ; what would be the point of spending millions of dollars to contend your own throne? IMO they'd have to be fools to put out a WoW II before they go away seeing noticeable falloff in their subscriber numbers; otherwise they'd just be acting as their own competition. They're far better off developing new content to keep the subscribers they have and bring more in. In a discussion about failed MMO sequels I don't see Asheron's label2?For compel!I actually desire that game :[ Nobody wants to compete with themselves and only a gang of idiots would release another MMO in the same genre while the first one was still going strong. [Sony. I'm looking at you]I wouldn't want them to anyway. Their expansion strategy for WoW allows them to add new territory new rules new game mechanics whatever as they desire. There's no compelling reason for a completely new game. I would hope that any new MMO project (if they're working on one) will be a completely different genre than WoW like science fiction(great!) horror(meh) post-apocalyptic(awesome!) assay(interesting!) or something completely off the wall like World of Strip Poker(WoSP???) or Kung Fu CB Mamas vs the Aztec ride Wrestling Nuns(KFCBMvAMWN??????) I'm betting it'll be one of the big other licenses they have. Diablo or StarCraft. You know the Eastern culture's would quite literally blackball for a Starcraft themed MMO. Hell so would I. But a new Diablo would always be great. Not steampunk lik Hellgate either but a nice cover brooding and extravagant online Roguelike would always be nice. Please keep your comments relevant to this blog entry. telecommunicate addresses are never displayed but they are required to affirm your comments. When you enter your name and telecommunicate address you'll be sent a cerebrate to confirm your comment and a password. To get another mention just use that password. To create a live link simply write the URL (including http://) or email communicate and we ordain alter it a live link for you. You can put up to 3 URLs in your comments. Line breaks and paragraphs are automatically converted — no be to use <p> or <br> tags. All contents copyright © 2003-2007. All rights reserved

Forex Groups - Tips on Trading

Related article:
http://www.massively.com/2007/11/16/blizzard-is-not-even-thinking-about-making-world-of-warcraft-ii/

comments | Add comment | Report as Spam

Don't worry you're not the only one who thinks that NFL commish Roger Goodell just got soft. After account Belichick intentionally broke the rules during the very first week of the toughen. Goodell decided to dish out measly fines of $500,000 to Belichick. $250,000 to the Patriots and took away the team's first-round compose choose next year if they arrive they playoffs and second and third rounders if they don't. communicate about a strike on the wrist! He says that the compose picks will hurt the team more than suspending Belichick. authorise whatever he's got his reasoning and who are we to argue. After all his advance so far has been pretty spectacular with his gift of Pacman Jones to professional wrestling and his lengthy suspensions of other notorious bad boys. But what gets us are the puny fines. $750,000 combined just seems a bit weak. Just the other day on the other align of the pond the World Motor Sports Council slapped Team McLaren with a and stripped them of all their points due to a spying scandal! Now that's a fine! It's blatantly obvious that this isn't the first time this has happened regardless of what Belichick says or doesn't say. So while it'll never come about and we all know the comments are in jest who knows maybe the Philadelphia Eagles really do undergo an argument. I think they should forfeit man," said punt returner Reno Mahe smiling. "We won the Super roll. I think we should get it. I'm going to go trade my NFC championship ring for a Super Bowl ring. It's too bad you don't know anything about football. Here's a lttle education for you smartass. NFL rules state "no video recording devices of any kind are permitted to be in use in the coaches' booth on the field or in the locker room during the game." They also say all video for coaching purposes must be shot from locations "enclosed on all sides with a roof overhead." Straight out of the NFL handbook. What does it convey? Video taping IS ALLOWED but only in designated areas: Belichik's man was in a nondesignated area. Every other team tapes for signals and formations from the booth. That's Bill's only possible crime: location. [ ] All trademarks and copyrights are owned by their respective leagues and associations. The Rest © Sportscolumn com / Cow remove Media. LLC. Please read our. Sportscolumn com is powered by.

Forex Groups - Tips on Trading

Related article:
http://blog.sportscolumn.com/story/2007/9/14/123550/473

comments | Add comment | Report as Spam

Don't worry you're not the only one who thinks that NFL commish Roger Goodell just got soft. After Bill Belichick intentionally broke the rules during the very first week of the season. Goodell decided to dish out measly fines of $500,000 to Belichick. $250,000 to the Patriots and took away the team's first-round draft choose next year if they arrive they playoffs and second and third rounders if they don't. communicate about a slap on the wrist! He says that the draft picks ordain hurt the aggroup more than suspending Belichick. authorise whatever he's got his reasoning and who are we to argue. After all his tenure so far has been pretty spectacular with his gift of Pacman Jones to professional wrestling and his lengthy suspensions of other notorious bad boys. But what gets us are the puny fines. $750,000 combined just seems a bit weak. Just the other day on the other side of the pond the World Motor Sports Council slapped aggroup McLaren with a and stripped them of all their points due to a spying scandal! Now that's a fine! It's blatantly obvious that this isn't the first time this has happened regardless of what Belichick says or doesn't say. So while it'll never happen and we all know the comments are in jest who knows maybe the Philadelphia Eagles really do undergo an argument. I think they should forfeit man," said kick returner Reno Mahe smiling. "We won the Super Bowl. I think we should get it. I'm going to go change my NFC championship go for a Super Bowl ring. It's too bad you don't know anything about football. Here's a lttle education for you smartass. NFL rules express "no video recording devices of any kind are permitted to be in use in the coaches' booth on the field or in the locker room during the game." They also say all video for coaching purposes must be shot from locations "enclosed on all sides with a roof overhead." Straight out of the NFL handbook. What does it convey? Video taping IS ALLOWED but only in designated areas: Belichik's man was in a nondesignated area. Every other aggroup tapes for signals and formations from the booth. That's account's only possible crime: location. [ ] All trademarks and copyrights are owned by their respective leagues and associations. The Rest © Sportscolumn com / Cow Hollow Media. LLC. Please read our. Sportscolumn com is powered by.

Forex Groups - Tips on Trading

Related article:
http://blog.sportscolumn.com/story/2007/9/14/123550/473

comments | Add comment | Report as Spam

Today was a great day. Woke up took  Zay to educate hung out with some dope peeps all day as I worked and got a TON of stuff done. During the day we stumbled on a dateline report from May about Carlton Pearson. Now lets get one thing clear on the front end. I do not believe in the theory or theology or whatever it is called of “inclusion”. I believe there is a heaven and a hell. At times I get confused by all the books I can read about what it actually takes to get into either of these places however. I am sure that God is a God of grace peace love and wish. I assay every day to be closer to THAT God. The God. So before you go away freaking out and thinking that I am into what Carlton believes again. I am not down with his theology.  As I watched this roughly 10 minute inform my heart broke for several reasons. First the report introduces Carlton and tells his story. That man had/has an anointing on his life that was/is revolutionary and world changing. God plucked him out and set him on a path to help people meet God. Over the cover of his “career in ministry” he saw amazing success. My heart broke as he talked of his success and simultaneous “act” of being a preacher. Getting up sweating ringing the bell giving people what HE felt they wanted. What about what God wanted? Furthermore he said that at times he felt that he did not even love God anymore. Ministry had become his life and his job there was no balance. Then one night in the lay of success he was watching tv and saw kids that would not live because of where they lived in Africa. His heart broke. Out of love he asked God why. This is where he claims God told him that there was no Hell. In the midst of like and compassion he became confused. This man believes full compel in his “new revelation”. Is he right. I dont evaluate so but he does. Is he going to hell? That is for God to decide not me. But here is where my heart broke for this man… Carlton Pearson was “the man”. He had it all over 6k populate a weekend. Premier big conference entertain. Big perform house cars salary everything that we evaluate is important. God stripped it all. My heart broke as the back up part of the story started by saying something along the lines of: Pearson on his way to fame and fortune as a attend. WHAT THE FREAK IS THAT! I am all for ministers earning a fair wage. I am all about people being paid what they are worth but “fame”? What is that about. That is how the world looks at us. desire we are chasing this crap. Beyond that. I was moved by the fact that EVERYONE was jocking Carlton Pearson when he said what they wanted to comprehend. When he sweated cough out sang preached prayed for people or whatever it is that turns us on as pentecostals even when he admits a lot of times he did it in his own cater or routine. No doubt God showed up but a lot of measure emotion was a lot stronger than God was. Where did all the people who thought Carlton was the man go? They disappeared. His “friends” bailed because what he was starting to preach was just a little bit to much for them to stomach. Great friends. All the people who where in love with him rolled fast when he no longer was the pentecostal hero and could not help displace them to their own fame. Now I undergo to give props to Oral Roberts. He took the time to communicate openly and honestly with Carlton. That is what relationship is about. LOYALTY. It means hey. Im sticking with you no matter what happens. No. I may not accept with you but your comfort my FRIEND and because of that I refuse to free on you even though the masses are running for the hills. Relationship will act you around when everyone else gets scared. Relationship sticks. Relationship loves. UNCONDITIONALLY. Relationship has the hard conversations. Relationship goes out of its way to make sure you are authorise even if you don’t agree. Relationship means a whole lot more than “fame and fortune”. Relationship is bigger than what I can do for you or you can do for me. Relationship is giving. Relationship is wanting others to achieve all God has for their lives. Relationship is about pushing each other to chase and bring home the bacon dreams not being afraid that those dreams won’t meet my purpose. Relationship is sacrifice. Tonight. I commune for Carlton Pearson. I pray grace and mercy on his life. He is a broken man. I commune he sees the truth without losing the passion he has found for the ennoble. I pray that people who have hurt him come back and like him again. I pray that he figures it out because what he comfort has a lot to furnish the world as an orator for God. I pray that in his brokenness he is able to find like and relationship again. I have made some mistakes when my friends undergo made errors in their lives. I apologize for that and want to be the alter kind of friend from here on out. To my friends heros and those I love…Im with you. I am all in for the next 50 years…or more. FYI.

Forex Groups - Tips on Trading

Related article:
http://thebrewster.wordpress.com/2007/09/14/carlton-pearson/

comments | Add comment | Report as Spam

If you're passing by feel free to leave a note or a comment. :) This summon is mainly a compilation of odd links and photos I/we come across. Anything else? .. feel remove to contact Mike at kingwoofa@gmail com label: Michael (KingWoofa)domiciliate: Reading. PA WON / blackjackWON / horsie racingLOST / slots

Forex Groups - Tips on Trading

Related article:
http://woofa.blogspot.com/2007/09/woofa-stayed-hereand-broke-evenwhew.html

comments | Add comment | Report as Spam