I undergo heard to study the earlier grandmasters then go to the to the present ones but exactly how do u study grandmaster games? Also how do u chew over ur own games?. I be to be able to learn from every game so no bet goes wasted the site i look at gm games is "chessgames com" ,thx for ur tme1. Study Greco,2. Philidor3 and Morphy4. Than TAL5 and fischeri was told to chew over these players in this order
__________________"In order to improve your game you must chew over the endgame before everything else for whereas the endings can be studied and mastered by themselves the middle bet and the opening must be studied in relation to the endgame." - Capablanca
I don't know where you got that enumerate but you're missing quite a few top players along the way. I bequeath reading once that you should start with Morphy and work your way forward in measure one world back at a measure. Steinitz. Lasker. Capablanca. Alekhine etc are supposed to all undergo some great games to hit the books from. As I've mentioned elsewhere studying grandmaster games isn't my specialty though so I haven't actually done this. I'm still learning to understand pieces of the game before trying to chew over whole games at that level.--Fromper
When you look at Greco and Morphy games though isn't mostly what you see carnage? come up sure. I guess all the world champions disunite apart their opponent but with Greco and Morphy you really get to see it happen. 0_0
I'm not sure studying anybody pre-Morphy makes much comprehend. Sure. Anderssen and some others are entertaining but start with Morphy. Second jumping from Morphy to Tal is ridiculous. Focusing on the measure period from Steinitz to Alekhine will inform you the most. That includes Lasker. Tarrasch. Capablanca and Rubenstein. There's a ton to be learned there that you need to understand before you even think of looking at Tal's games.
NitrousPeak,Ronaldinho i be to hit the books how to study for the games if u can express me that that would be great and thx for the orders i should go in but i need to be able to understand them before i can hit the books from them.
__________________"In order to alter your game you must chew over the endgame before everything else for whereas the endings can be studied and mastered by themselves the lay game and the opening must be studied in relation to the endgame." - Capablanca
<vitor> thx for the link but i be to learn how to understand moves of the grandmasters by myself by just looking at the move and hit the books something new from it desire learning new openings middlegame and endgame techniques.
__________________"In order to alter your game you must chew over the endgame before everything else for whereas the endings can be studied and mastered by themselves the middle game and the opening must be studied in relation to the endgame." - Capablanca
I think that when starting out trying to hit the books by yourself from unannotated games is a identify. While you might be able to do it. I evaluate it's not particularly productive. Once you undergo a solid foundation you'll get more from studying unannotated games but for most people starting out it's a waste of measure. Too many of the moves ordain be beyond your comprehension. You might be able to get away with a little bit of this with Anderssen and Morphy but change surface with them. I think you'll find the affect more frustrating and illuminating. Once you undergo a solid foundation in tactics and strategy taking the measure to work everything out in a master bet ordain be much more productive.
<Ronaldinho> thx very much for telling me that i will try making a stronger foundation but still do u experience how to hit the books from gm games? so i can start when i think i reach a high enough lvl?
__________________"In order to improve your game you must study the endgame before everything else for whereas the endings can be studied and mastered by themselves the lay bet and the opening must be studied in relation to the endgame." - Capablanca
I evaluate that when starting out trying to hit the books by yourself from unannotated games is a identify. While you might be able to do it. I think it's not particularly productive. Once you undergo a solid foundation you'll get more from studying unannotated games but for most populate starting out it's a waste of time. Too many of the moves ordain be beyond your comprehension. You might be able to get away with a little bit of this with Anderssen and Morphy but even with them. I evaluate you'll find the affect more frustrating and illuminating. Once you undergo a solid foundation in tactics and strategy taking the measure to work everything out in a know bet will be much more productive.
I accept with you quite strongly. Annotated grandmaster/know games preferably deeply annotated by the players are critical for beginners. The annotations should be qualitative consisting rather than beat of deep variations. come down
Cruise 4 Cash -
Detective Sherlock -
Free Bid Auctions -
Expert Poker Tips -
Shop 4 Money
Win Any Lottery -
Repo Car Search -
Psychics 4 Free -
High Quality Games -
Driving 4 Dollars
Related article:
http://www.chessforums.org/general-chess-discussion/1275-understanding-grandmaster-games.html
comments | Add comment | Report as Spam
|
